Thursday, December 12, 2019

Ethical Dilemma for Citizenship and Sustainability - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theEthical Dilemma for Citizenship and Sustainability. Answer: What are the ethical problems you identified in your chosen YouTube video? There are three ethical issues related to the early launch of a product without testing the product. Ownership: The employee is the owner of the information related to the organization and if he left the organization, then there is the possibilities that he might be companied by the competitors and this could cause a serious loss to the organization. Privacy and Security: Launching a product without testing (specially, systems) could result in certain bugs and glitches in the system that might affect the customer experience. This will cost in all the way for the organization from its selling to the reputation in the market (Dawid et al., 2017). Control: Controlling the employees according to personal satisfaction can be categorized in an ethical dilemma and forcing the junior employee to do decisions according to personal interest without considering the consequences will ultimately affect the organization. Why are these ethical problems? It is an ethical issue as the agent here has to make the decision on whether the product should be launched or not, or he should talk to the seniors or he should just leave the organization. It is his responsibility to choose the best option with all respective. This creates a different courses of actions, among which he will have to decide to take the decision. The third condition that makes it an ethical dilemma is that irrespective of the chosen course of action, the individual will compromise certain ethical principle (Cooper et al., 2015). This results in no matter what decision is taken by the individual; it will not be a perfect solution. Who is responsible for these problems? Many stakeholders are responsible for these problems, as an ethical dilemma does not occur due to an individuals course of action only. The very first responsible person is the individual who was not present to complete the evaluation process of the systems. If that individual was already there, this situation had never been raised (Cui, 2015). Second responsible person is the executive manager who ordered to launch the product without evaluation without considering the consequences. The third individual responsible for this situation is the agent himself, as he does not know what to do and how to settle the situation considering all the aspects related to the actions. Who is affected by these problems? The very first affected sector will be the organization receiving the products, as the operational activities of the organization will be completely dependent on the systems in manner to share, store, and execute the data and information. Un-tested launching of the systems might lead to certain software and hardware issues that will alternatively affect the production or output of the organization. Regarding database, cyberattacks and data breaches are concerning topics and not evaluating the systems will not ensure that the operating system and software will be updated (Heizer, 2016). This will lead to the privacy and security issues relat4d to the data and information of the organization and the stakeholders whose information have been saved into the database. What project management strategies could have prevented these problems from arising in the first place? Utilitarianism or Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics, Social Contract and Deontological Ethics are the management strategies that could be implemented for preventing such problems that might rises the issues related to the ethical issues. Utilitarianism can be represented as results-based ethics that states that the correct ethical choice chosen at the situation is the one that is favorable for most of the involved individuals while not favorable for some of the stakeholders (Crane Matten, 2016). Virtual ethics put emphasis on the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach that emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism). Which of the three actions in your chosen YouTube video is better? Why? Program Director listens to the team will be the most suitable action for all the stakeholders as there will be not any bad consequence of this case only there will be delay in the delivery. The consumers will also understand the importance of data and information saved into their database and after proper communication; they will understand that delay in the delivery will be most suited for their organization (Monczka et al., 2015). The top most priority for making customers believe in the organization and protect the information gathered from the research as the information is the only power in this competitive market that could keep the organization on the track of the competition. What action, other than the three in your chosen YouTube video, can best resolve the problems? Delivering the ten percent of the total delivery and with proper certification in which it is mentioned that the organization will be only responsible for further data breach or intrusions. This will insure that the further consequences will be completely on the organization itself. However, certain loss will be there but, the supplier will be completely detached from the bad consequences and the loss will be only on the other side of the supply (Yawar Seuring, 2017). On the other hand, the consumer enterprise might feel that there is no one to blame so it is better to have some delay in the delivery than later consequences. Who should take the best action? Why? The program director should take the best action in manner to have proper communication with the project manager and the consumer. This conversation will be helpful in minimizing the loss and ensuring the effective and efficient supply and customer experience. This will also ensure the security of the further customers of the consumer enterprise (Laudon Laudon, 2016). This will ensure safety for every stakeholder related with both the organization and consumers of the organizations. Thus, this will be the best solution in all aspects in manner to ensure the privacy and security issues of the stakeholders. What are the implications of the best action on the projects time, cost and quality? The cost must have been decided earlier before the delivery of the supplies however, there will be delay in the supply and consumer organization will be facing certain problems. Quality will be the best as for today, the best defense for the cyberattacks and breaches that might affect the organization and protect it from being closed (Hofmann et al., 2014). Time is one of the greatest factor related to the performance and output of the organization but the safety and security should be given the highest priority in manner to ensure the betterment and reputation in the market. What are the consequences of the best action on the project stakeholders? All the stakeholders will be saved from the bad consequences rather than the consumer organization and the supplier organization will be able maintain its reputation in the market. The costumers of the consumer organization will be able to maintain its sustainability in the market and take competitive advantage of the market (Wecket, 2017). On the other hand, the consumers organization will also be able maintain such level in the market and their consumers will be safe from further privacy and security threat in the future. References: Cooper, R. W., Clapham, S. E., Frank, G. L., Kemp, R. A. (2015). Ethical Issues for Supply Managers: Then and Now?.Journal of Business and Behavior Sciences,27(1), 54. Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016).Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Cui, G. (2015). Ethical issues in ethnic segmentation and target marketing. InProceedings of the 1998 Multicultural Marketing Conference(pp. 87-91). Springer, Cham. Dawid, H., Decker, R., Hermann, T., Jahnke, H., Klat, W., Knig, R., Stummer, C. (2017). Management science in the era of smart consumer products: challenges and research perspectives.Central European Journal of Operations Research,25(1), 203-230. Heizer, J. (2016).Operations Management, 11/e. Pearson Education India. Hofmann, H., Busse, C., Bode, C., Henke, M. (2014). Sustainability?related supply chain risks: conceptualization and management.Business Strategy and the Environment,23(3), 160-172. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5M7ohdZ6qA Laudon, K. C., Laudon, J. P. (2016).Management information system. Pearson Education India. Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., Patterson, J. L. (2015).Purchasing and supply chain management. Cengage Learning. Weckert, J. (Ed.). (2017).Computer ethics. Routledge. Yawar, S. A., Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: a literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes.Journal of Business Ethics,141(3), 621-643.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.